|← Crime Deterrents||Rights of Accused →|
Custom Gun Control Policy essay paper
Gun control is a policy designed to limit the production, possession or use of firearms or guns by private citizens (Henderson, 9). The guns in question are mostly personal firearms that include long guns and handguns. Gun control rules and policies vary in different parts of the world. E.g., the United Kingdom, imposes extremely strict rules on gun possession while the rules and limits in the U.S.A. are relatively modest (Georgetown Public Policy Review, 3 cl 2).
Discussions held on controlling firearms are mostly polemical and unfruitful. In frequent gun control debates, individuals who often advocate for an outright ban on personal possession of firearms differ with those who assert the right to own a gun meant for protection or lawful recreation. Policies developed by the World Health Organization, advocate for preventive strategies that one must take into account between the weapons violence.
Crucially, guns and firearms increase lethality of situational violence. This is inclusive of fights that that are often fuelled by alcohol and gang violence (Cozic, 92). By using firearms, violent incidents can turn into a situation in which people are killed and others suffering lasting disabilities. Controlling tools that bring about violence can limit the amount of damages that individuals can get.
Youth violence is a widespread phenomenon in the United States. It is rated second in leading the deaths of individuals within the age bracket of ten to twenty four (Nisbet, 123). On this view, fewer guns result to less crime. Thus, a two-step linkage is between gun control and rates of crime. One is the impact caused by gun control on how available and accessible firearms and the second are the effects of the occurrence of guns on the commission of crimes.
However, high rates of crime are mostly cited as being justifiable and more stringent gun control rules. Since the relationship between gun control and crime rates often unfold over time, they are, however, not simultaneously determined in the usual sense of econometrics (Nisbet, 45).
Researchers who attempt to estimate the results associated with gun control on the rates of crime face two possible problems. The fist is how gun control is to be measured and the second being the empirical counterpart of gun control (The Congressional Digest 65.5 (1986). The effectiveness and efficiency of any gun control statute depends not only on its statute being written down on a book, but on the degree of enforcing the law (The Congressional Digest 65.5 (1986). Two jurists can have similar gun control statute but have different effects. This is because, in one jurisdiction, minimal effort is devoted to enforcing the regulation. Gun laws enforcements must be taken into account so that gun control assessment is well done.
Americans constitute the heaviest society that is armed in the developed world. It has a 40% household figure of individuals with guns (Nisbet, 78). Violence, being a complex phenomenon that cannot be attributed to any single cause is dramatically influenced by methods used. The popular conception that claims the source of gun violence to be the illegal market is entirely separated from the legitimate firearms industry. In fact, illegal gun markets lays directly downstream to the legal market (Nisbet, 85). Almost without any exception, most illegal guns in the United States began as a legal product that was made or imported by a company that was licensed by the Federal government, and sold by a licensed dealer. It may enter the illegal market in various ways. For instance, it may be bought legally and resold later illegally. This could be a gun show or in a private meeting.
One way of dismantling the illegal markets is by stopping the migration of firearms and guns from their legal holders. This can be through taking control of the lawful supply sources. The relationship that arises between gun laws and gun violence is a question that arouses keen interest and controversy in the US (Cozic, 68). Many factors complicate the issue. They include; levels of urbanization, demographic factors, unemployment, poverty, alcohol and substance abuse, among others. Gun laws are most of the times phased in gradually such that their effects take years to be felt. Gun laws and gun violence can have a reciprocal effect. This effect can be difficult to deconstruct.
Registration acts as a crucial tool against gun trafficking. This is because it allows laws, which are against multiple ales to be enforced. Without registrations, one may not know whether an individual exceed the monthly limit required.
Some scholars believe that gun control can marginally reduce the rate of homicide by making guns progressively scarce in the social environment. Some claim that all mainstreams criminologists recognize the, independent contributing, clause to a society’s homicide rate.
Decrease on the number of violent acts may not be caused by gun controls, but gun controls help reduce their lethality (Georgetown Public Policy Review. 6.1 (2001). Several few years ago, California required the law-abiding citizens with rifles to register them with the state. This was done through the state going out of its way to guarantee law-abiding citizens that their second amendment rights would not be infringed. Guns in this country are becoming less available. Specific areas have been banned in the country.
A political ideology that has been in place for years, that floats from one society to the other and sorts to destroy and dominate anyone who disagrees with it. The ideology has found a home in America and has allowed flourishing under a certain form of governance. True and real criminals do not often show their true colors. However, they often do so in the end. They eliminating their opposition, often do this.
Guns, unlike autos, are extremely dangerous. They were invented for the military. Their main purpose was to cause harm and threat to the enemy. The literature of guns advocates support that guns are inherently dangerous. It advocates for the private ownership of guns to prevent crime and arm the militia (Nisbet, 185).
Even guns not used to harm humans under normal circumstances have purposes on the fundamental purpose of guns. In a different perspective, gun controls is not about what private individuals should do, but about what the governments should allow these private individuals to do. The risk of permitting private ownership of guns should be determined.
Judgment of risk should also be further tempered by the costs of enforcement
There are thousands of state and local control statutes. However, the index group authors resold gun control measures into the following; Registration of firearms. This is inclusive of purchase permits and the registration of guns. There should be safety training, which is often required before the purchase of a gun (Nisbet, 120). Also, included is the regulation of firearm sales. This is inclusive of background checks, a waiting period before the completion of a sale and the minimum age requirement for purchasing a firearm. The owner’s license for possession of a gun and the presence of more restrictive county and municipal ordinances are essential requiems.
If one wants to study the effects of gun control law, the individual can use a carefully constructed index of gun control laws, which has several advantages. Its efficiency may not be dependent of the gun control rules of the neighboring countries (Henderson, 98). Secondly, usage of the index offers a number of statistical advantages. Moreover, it avoids the problems associated with co linearity that is among gun control measures.
Firearms are often passed down through generations of family members. It, therefore, could be difficult to deal with regularity the problem of transfer of firearms that takes place between a non-dealer and a private party. Although gun controls are politically attractive due to their ability to “deal directly” with the problem at hand can, in fact, turn out to be a blunt instrument for reducing crime.
Effective gun control can involve crucial unintended effects. Governmental extensive to regulate private transfers of firearms would raise crucial civil liberties issues.