Organizational Behavior

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working as   part of a team for the individual

Working as a team has a team may present good tidings or otherwise. They say: “two heads are better than one” everyone also understands that the same wise people insist that “many chefs spoil the broth”. Team work has mixed results for the organization, as well as individual members. In a team, individual may benefit from their participation from their contribution to the overall achievement of the team’s objectives. However, there are disadvantages of individual participation in a team.

One advantage of team work to individuals is that it helps them develop that sense of belonging when working with others. It also helps individuals to develop a personal responsibility towards work because they feel accountable for the outcome of their action in the team’s ultimate result. Besides, team work raises an individual’s self-esteem since they feel respected and worthwhile because of their individual contributions towards the group’s success. In addition, an individual improves their relationship with others through team work, entrenching unity and creating strong bonds with fellow participants (Benefits of Working in a Team n.d.).

On the other hand, team work may hinder creativity of an individual because of the standards that a team may set, and regulations that members have to follow. It may also a platform for individuals to get into conflicts with others because of their differences in opinion and approaches towards the same issue. Sometimes, team work may make an individual feel less important than others if others do not appreciate his or her contribution. Moreover, a team may serve as a source of confusion to individuals when they do not understand the ideas of others (Chris n.d.).

‘There’s no such thing as ‘stress.’......it’s all in an individual’s head and just an excuse to take time off work’. Critically evaluate this statement.

Stress may occur because of a number of reasons. Some causes of stress may be internal to a person. In this case, it could be a person’s own thoughtful thinking about their problems, ambitions and aspirations in a difficult way that lead them into stressful conditions. Other causes of stress to an individual may be external pressures from other people’s actions that do affect him or her, and environmental pressures beyond human control. Understanding the cause of an individual’s stressful being is crucial in deciding whether it is their own choice to be the way they are, or otherwise.

When an individual handles issues of personal importance in an exaggerated manner that may cause stress, this becomes a matter of choice for the given individual’s condition. There are some issues that people know they cannot handle. Such matters do not need to stress anyone. Essentially, a person has a choice to of either suffering from stress or not. For instance, a student who allows hates himself or herself, for failing an exam welcomes stress into their life. Another simply ignores it and moves on with other tasks. In a different scenario, the death of a loved one is a sure way of stressing someone. This is unplanned, unavoidable and highly devastating.

Regardless of the cause of stress to an individual, it remains bear truth that the condition is a state of mind. The question as to whether or not the condition is a tactical move to take time off work remains controversial. If the stress is unavoidable then such a prejudgment is utterly unacceptable. In case an individual creates the stress through personal thinking then the notion is a welcome conclusion. What matters is the cause of stress and not the mere fact that it is a state of mind because it is.

‘An employee’s individual personality has no part to play in his/her day to day behavior at work. It’s not something employers need to worry about’. Critically evaluate this statement.

Employees’ behavior is extremely crucial in their daily engagements at work. Organizations value reputation and good relations with their partners and, most importantly, their customers. There are rules and regulations in all organizations that seek to control employees’ ways of conduct and behavior in their respective positions. The existence and enforcement of strict policies in respect of employee terms and conditions of service firmly hinge on their commitment to company rules and regulations. This is an indication that organizations acknowledge their involvement with the labor force with diverse personalities.

It is noteworthy that personalities determine individual attitudes of individuals. An employee’s attitude then has a direct influence in the way they act and execute their mandate their respective capacities within an organization. This, in essence, shows that there exists a direct link between personality, attitude and individual behavior. Employers need employees who are friendly and with a positive attitude towards work. That way, they have the confidence of the employee’s ability to serve as an attractive towards customers and an agent of good reputation to the public. However, this is not always the case because different people have different personalities. Hence, they do have different attitudes towards colleagues, customers and work.

Essentially, a person cannot rule out the fact that an individual’s personality has significant influence in the way they behave. In organizations, strict rules and regulations in place serve as its acknowledgement of that reality. It is, therefore, exceedingly misleading to assert that “An employee’s individual personality has no part to play in his/her day to day behavior at work. It’s not something employers need to worry about”. No employer fails to worry when they discover that an employee has questionable personality. This, in some cases, may lead to termination of an employee’s contract.

Order now

Related essays