Leadership is the art of influencing people, to willingly strive, and work with zeal, and confidence towards the achievement of group goals (Weth, 2007. As pointed out by Weth, a strong leader should exhibit demonstrable traits be able to lead his followers who require direction. However, in order to improve on my weakness, I need to put strategies in place. Weth contends that an effective leader is one who makes proper use of his authority and provides direction. However, sometimes leaders misuse their power and authority by instructing people around.
In today’s world of global business competitiveness, leadership and management are vital ingredients for the success of any organization. An effective leader should have the ability to influence others in order to accomplish and achieve the goals and objectives of an organization. An effective manager on the other hand is associated with good aspects of coordinating, controlling and directing of assignments (Pedlar et al. 2007).
In any organization, the need for effective and efficient interpersonal skills cannot be underscored, especially to leaders and managers who are charged with the responsibility of finding equilibrium between business needs and personal needs of employees. Pedlar et al (2007) assert that interpersonal skills are crucial to the development of strong business and social relationships among employees, management and even stake holders. However, mangers that lack interpersonal skills are more likely to be inefficient, confused, poor communicators of vital information and this may have negative impacts on the organization’s profitability.
Young public leaders have transformed the world and for this reason, I oppose the notion that young public leaders are less effective with concerns to their experience. In the public domain, many young leaders have been disqualified from various positions due to the claim that they have less or no experience. However, with regards to youth-led organizations and young people who have founded various public-held organizations, it is unethical to declare that the youth are not viable to hold public offices. Concerning the current technological world, many of the changes that have been registered are steered by the youth, who, through innovation, have been able to capture the technological aspects of life to steer organizations and other domains towards change.
Several individuals have been in the public domain making change to the world that, in other terms, would be aging out of proportion. For this reason, consider three of the most influential youths that have existed in the recent past. These, among others, may not have had the experience to lead the public, but they had the innovation and right mindsets to lead. To start this list is the late Steve Jobs who founded Apple Computer Inc. when he was only 21 years of age. The fact that Apple was founded in the year 1974 makes Steve one of the pioneer youths to create a highly recognized organization. With innovation and natural leadership skills, Steve Jobs was able to lead Apple into success with its initial Macintosh II and III. This led the world of computers to change as other tech organizations were forced to incorporate quality and innovation to their computer brands (Belcher, 2008).
Secondly, Richard Branson founded the virgin group at the age of 20, and his foundation has been one of the most recognized in the airlines business. Considering the young age at which Branson founded the Virgin Group, it is clear that he did not have leadership experience at that tender age. However, being able to pull through the hardships of steering a company in such a competitive field, Richard was able to co-exist with other leaders who were regarded to be much experienced. In this case, the aspect of leadership does not rely on experience. However, with regards to the competitive world, the youths of today are leaders of tomorrow – at least this is what critics of youth leadership say. The alleged tomorrow is years in to the future, where many of the current youths would be aged before they are experienced therefore, disqualifying them from being referred to as youth.
Lastly, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of the popular social network, Facebook, founded it at the age of 20. Many of the youthful leaders that are active in founding organizations that lead the world to change have decided to do so, because they are not allowed the chance to lead on their own. The start of Facebook was aimed at providing college students with a way of communicating to each other in campus. However, with time, the network grew and lead to worldwide operation. Along the way, people who believe the youth cannot lead offered Zuckerberg up to $1 billion in exchange for Facebook. However, with leadership mind and the vision being a priority of his endeavors, Zuckerberg followed his dream of being influential and led facebook to a worldwide recognition making facebook one of the highly valued organizations in the world with an estimated value of over $65 billion.
The fact that experience is a crucial requirement in some organizations and the public scene, critics have the feeling that the youth are not qualified enough to hold any public office. Leadership in the political scene is one of the reasons that many people do not approve when it comes to youth’s leadership. In many occasions, the people aged 40 years and below, have been put on record for abusing public offices. With regards to senators and governors, sexual misconduct has derailed the notion that the youth can lead properly. However, the fact that misconduct has been registered in the public offices held by the youth does not mean that age and experience come in play.
Secondly, besides the experience that is needed for various forms of leadership, many still believe that only people with experience can hold offices effectively. However, the fact that the youth are not given the chance to lead, they lose on future leading opportunities. The groups that believe youths cannot lead due to the lack of experience are forced to believe so, because they do not share the same education, age brackets or even exposure to various activities as the youth. Leadership has divided the existing productive generations into two: the elderly believe the youth lack the necessary experience to lead, while the youth believe the elderly lack appreciation for various technological and social factors (Linden & Fertman, 1998).
For the last 50 years, the attitudes of leadership have changed. This is because the elderly who have been developing organizations and political parties are facing more competition on self-motivated youthful groups. For example, 38 years ago, Steve Jobs founded Apple, because he did not have the experience needed to work for or with IMB after dropping out of college. About 6 to 8 years ago, Zuckerberg would not have qualified to work for or Microsoft, because Bill Gates expects people with experience; however, this has changed, and Microsoft and Facebook work hand in hand. For this reason, the current public domain has changed in that the elderly have noticed that the youths are more innovative and dynamic in terms of thought, knowledge and excogitation.
Many leaders have drawn inspiration from sport teams that required high, intense attentiveness on the goal, spirit, and absolute determination to excel by stretching capacities to limits. The older people therefore help to inspire young people to rise and bring change to the society. This is so because one is not born a leader, but is made a leader.