Introduction

Numerous researches undertaken recently have indicated that there is an increasing number of random drug testing in public schools. However, the test is significant among High Schools with athletes or Athletes High Schools due to the standards required to meet. The proportion of these contexts is set at a benchmark when every effort has to ensure that individual participants are free from drug use. According to the department office of national Drug Control Policy, it is critical to adopt this system because it is efficient. Although it seems as an ambush strategy, many commentators say that it is good for the educational system of athletes to follow the cases of drug use by some athletes (Russel, Jennings & Classey 2005).

A number of tests were conducted beyond the announced Supreme Court sanctions. In this endeavour, the Supreme Court had put restrictions to the test students who take part in these activities as extracurricular. This means that any public High Schools Athletes that undertake such tests on students risk subjecting themselves to vulnerable legal position. According to the Supreme Court these exceptional students who do not have to be tested are either put on probation or drive to school. In the same line, it is critical to consider the fact that legal issues are critical in this endeavour. Nevertheless, the students in the Public High Schools who are being subjected to random drug testing portray intentions to do away with risks of using illicit substances. This projected to increased decline in using drugs to excel in extracurricular activities (Pope, Vincus & Hanley 2007).

Numerous studies have indicated that the focus is to start from the middle school as well as extended to high schools. This is ultimately because such behaviour might lead to the extended abuse that might lead to poor performance in class. Random drug testing on public High school has also attracted much controversy following court rulings by the Washington State Supreme Court. This is because the random tests on students in public high schools are considered unlawful, thus unconstitutional and illegal.

It is clear that random drug testing has attracted various bodies of interests in the United States. These are two sides of the same coin because it seems suspicious to carry out such acts, but at the same time it appears to be a good measure that shuns students from practicing the use of such drugs. Study showed that the majority of students in much public high school that undertook these testing procedures included students who were considered significant. Thus, it comes as a clash with the Supreme Court ruling (Pope, Vincus & Hanley 2007).

Public high schools have undertaken random tests in an effort to reduce drug abuse among students. These education institutions that conduct random testing as a measure achieve a deterrent mechanism to students against falling and resisting peer pressure to indulge in drug abuse. In addition, random drug testing helps identify adolescents with intentions of indulging in drug abuse at an early age. This helps identify those who practiced drug abuse before so that they can be treated.

Conclusion

Drug abuse does not just interfere with the capability of the student to study in school, but also disrupts a conducive environment for the teacher to educate students during lessons. Nevertheless, random drug testing in public schools is not the only solution to the drug problem. It should be complimented with other broader prevention and intervention mechanisms in an effort to decrease the use of drugs by students. Students who are tested with positive results of drug use need to be treated and refereed for counselling as well as rehabilitated if the condition is worse.

Order now

Related essays