One cannot say with absolute certainty that a fallacy is true or false. This is because a fallacy is a statement that has not yet been classified as true or false due to lack of sufficient information on the subject matter. There are many types of fallacies, which are grouped by the appeal made and the reception of the statement from the society.
Loopholes make it ineffective
This fallacy falls under the category of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. This is based on the analogy that two actions have a causal relationship and that one is as a result of the other. In this case, the existence of loopholes leads to inefficiency. The inefficiency could be caused by variables that are unclear to the parties at the time of the debate.
Because it does not ban all things (milkshakes), it should not ban one thing
This falls under hasty generalization under fallacies of logos. This is a broad statement that seeks to discredit the banning of milkshakes. If an act is justified, then it does not matter if all other acts are considered. This is because the single act is correct and has occurred justly.
Drinking soda does not harm anyone but the buyer
This statement leads towards the fallacy of ignorance. Soda can cause much harm, which the speaker, might not have considered at the time he was relaying this information. These could include deprivation of natural resources by massive use of raw materials used in the manufacture of soda. Hence, by saying this statement, the speaker clearly shows that his knowledge on the side effects of soda is limited.
Slippery slope issues click it or ticket issue
This fallacy is self explanatory. It falls under the category of fallacies of logos. Here, the matter at hand is seen as to cause a series of other wrongful occurrences. Hence, this is used to discredit the issue. Even with this, the act might not be a direct cause of all the other wrongful occurrences.