After many years of intensive research and investment in education, governments around the globe have come to the realization that they cannot rely solely on their local scientist and investors to come up with everything. Major global progresses have been actuated through combination of technologies from different quotas. Currently governments around Europe and America are encouraging internalization of education to bring in curriculum and invention integration that every nation is yarning for. According to the results submitted by a commission led by Lincoln in 2005 if America’s economy is to continue growing exponentially it has to let some of its citizens to study abroad like many other nations around the globe are doing. It is now paramount that the globe shares the outcomes of scientific prowess with others to maintain integrity and harmony especially now that the global economics are very much interconnected with each other.
Government and other social society groups share in the notion that for the American government to keep up with the current pace of global economic and technological growth it has to encourage its populace to study abroad and stop the current culture and belief that the educational system in America is more superior to other systems around the globe. Paul Simon’s commission that was established after Lincoln’s recommendation asserted that students that study abroad are found to have a deeper understanding of the global woes and are thus better placed to make more informed decision regarding global crises.
Students that study abroad get a chance to study more languages and understand other cultures that are not emphasized in the United States; as a result they develop better interpersonal skills, communication skills and other professional skills (Cushner and Mahon 2002). Without interlinking of cultures around the world, some of the challenges that the world has faced previously might recur but they can be avoided through sharing of experiences. Previous study by abroad participants indicated that students that underwent this system improved their abilities to work on ambiguous tasks, self-confidence and maturity (Carlson et al. 2004). This attributes are as a results of facing non sequential tasks as they are traditionally done in the normal way.
There are many attributes that can be connected to internalization of education. Many theorists have tried to expound the theory that studying abroad is opening up our country rather than encouraging everyone to user the domestic curriculum. Internalization of education has from time to time encouraged human capital transfer from all corners of the globe. Inviting learners from other regions brings in new talents and capabilities from to United States; as a result things might take lesser time to solve; in fact the government has managed to maintain high level of technological and economic growth through integration of cultures. Knowledge contest between individuals from different regions results in active and rapid technological innovation. There is a theory held by sociologist that declares that educational choices of students are affected by their social settings. If students are not studying from their native home countries they are likely to change their perception about some of the subjects and consequently the society as a large will benefit (St. John and Asker 2001). It has also been observed that moving to other regions in pursuit for academic prowess helps students to drop habits that had previously been held by the families. After interacting with other nationals they are likely to change the way they do things and improve from what was traditionally practiced by their families. Academic choices and goals are often subject to environment. Sometimes schools affect career choice of individual but when they make a residential shift they are likely to face new challenges and they might change their minds and pursue different careers and consequently benefit the local society and nation.
Although internalization of education has many great attributes, it has introduced some detrimental aspects into the society. Every nation has its traditions and every society has its values. We cherish the quality and strength of our education as a country because along the way our founding fathers did not give up on the system or abandon it for another nations system. They dedicated immense time and resources to develop what they deemed fit for our societies. Although a small percentage of the population should be allowed to study abroad, emphasis should remain in strengthening our institutions, curriculums are structured with the challenges of the society at heart and thus they produce the most desirable results (Lambert, 1989). There are educational bodies and other institutions that work continuance to ensuring that the nation has the best and most updated curriculum. Most of the courses and units offered are driven by the current markets demands and challenges. Many leaders and theorists have been advocating for internalization of education but none of them has provided a suitable argument as to why students should study abroad. Although people need to acquaint themselves with challenge that is facing other regions people should not use the excuse as a leeway for exporting brains and revenue across the boundaries (Kitsantas, 2004, p.431). The decision to study abroad is affected by a few other elements like availability of finances, preparation, and perception of the intended success of the program to be pursued. Culture and believe of a people or affects the decision to study elsewhere. It has been observed that most of the students that take keen interest in studying abroad have parents that are either very well educated or were themselves international students. Most students that wish to study abroad starts preparing for the course by studying international languages as they prepare for their college time. However students that take no interest in studying abroad perceive the process as unnecessary and tedious. From the arguments presented by different studies it emerges that internalization of education is necessary but not necessary compulsory for any given society. Nations moderate their education according to their needs and culture, it is thus important that student first study what their native countries have to offer before embarking on international studies. This way they are not only able to integrate with others but also they able to work at home without any difficulties.