Mary Rowlandson narrative comprises the Indian captivity around 1675 after the Lancaster attack. Her narrative was republished all through the colonial years when it became a testament that describes God’s challenges and deliverance for the puritans. Mary’s narrative became a strong testament on the strong faith in God during a trying hour when many people left congregational church. On the other hand, Hannah Dustin was taken captive about a decade after Mary Rowlandson. She was taken captive together with her nurse “Neff”. They were brave enough to take hatchets and hacked their captors to death in the night before taking away their scalps.
The two women narratives were dictated to Mother, which associated them with religious interpretations with perpetuated belief that the women were chosen by God in the world. Hence, Mother used them to generate a new church that was more comfortable. However, the two women coped with captivity with their own unique way; this captivity revealed a lot of custom among the native America by the manner the two women were treated.
Mary Rowlandson strongly believed that God is supreme and good. She was committed to her Christian faith, owing her survival in the time of captivity to the mercies of God. She believed that God played a major role in her life by showing His Grace upon her. Hannah Dustin was a bit violent and her narrative depicted frontier conditions at the time of King Williams war. Her morals were questionable after she killed her Indian captors and even tried to run away with their scalps.Her story is related to Jael’s story from the Bible.
Calculate the price
The two women went through many problems in the hands of their captors that were described as “tender mercies are cruelties”. Their hearts found solace in the good God and thus they believed to have favor in His hands. They related this to the kindness of master, who had laid claim on them. At some point, it was recorded that the women were prayerful with the hope of making their lives tolerable or bearable.
Mary Rowlandson had some sort of biasness towards the Indians, but in order to survive her ordeals during the captivity she had to conform and “adapt” so that she could have survived. For instance, Mary had to accept and eat the food that was presented to her, a thing she disregarded in the past. She actually viewed the Indians as beasts since they could tell fortunes by food and eat meat from all sort of birds. For fear of starving to death, she had to eat the food. There is also a part in the story when she snatched her baby’s piece of meat after she had finished hers. The narrative questions her morals and compares them to her captors.
In two narratives the women are seen going through an environmental context of hunger; this signifies the removal of their homes or comfort zones to face starvation which is beyond their control and also depicts affliction, which engrains fear that is related to existence in the wilderness hence it awakens s dependence on God. This relates to story of Moses and the Israelites the wilderness.
300 words per page instead of 280
Free Revisions (on demand)
Free plagiarism report (on demand)
As the Indian captors abducted Mary and her daughter, she was very distraught because of the separation from her family; she believed that God had good intensions since she viewed all what happened to her as divine. Hence, her story was the first of misfortunes through the providence of God. Her faith was immensely tested, especially when she lost one of her children; Mary found a reason to glorify God because of the ones that returned safe.
Although Hanna Dustin was determined to escape from the cruel captivity, she was ready to face death, revenge all for her child’s death. She even prearranged an attack; she executed killing of twelve captors while they were asleep, including children and women. Hannah was a fighter and she had the heart to pursue her dream besides the hardships she went through in her captivity. There is a great contrast between Mary and Hanna. Mary is so spiritual and soft-spoken, while Hannah seems to be an astute and violent woman. However, the two women have deep feelings for their families, especially their children, although each one expresses it differently.
In both instances the two women lost their children, but we see Hannah getting shrewd and we see her trying her best to revenge, yet Mary is just thankful to God for preserving her and other children while thanking for taking the little one, who died, and saving her despite the ordeals in the captivity.