Sentencing Stage in a Criminal Trial

To begin with, the stages of a criminal case are numerous as it complies with the Anglo-American law system. There is no need to list all of them. The aim of this paper is to focus precisely on the sentencing stage which is, obviously, the most exciting and desired out of the whole process. Thus, sentencing stage is especially vital in a criminal trial as it imposes a penalty on an accused person if all tries to drop charges were unsuccessful. It depends on the judicial treatment of the case and (in many cases) on the jury’s verdict.

First of all, it is vital to mention that the sentencing stage is the final and rigid verdict which can be appealed thereafter, but still it is defined separately as the second vital huge stage after the criminal trial (litigation). In this vein, the stage manifests the final decision made either by the court or by the jury in relation to an accused person. Moreover, “sentencing, or the imposition of a penalty, occurs after a trial where someone is convicted of a crime” (Mann, 2004, p. 1). Its purpose is to announce the final decision of the court and the measure of punishment. The main challenges presuppose particular differences in the law system between different countries and different states within a definite country. The question is that in some states sentencing is separately heard, but in others it follows after the trial is over (Mann, 2004).

Given that, sentencing stage is a very significant stage of a criminal trial as it presupposes the measure of punishment for an accused person and further follow-up of the case. It is a procedural prescription which serves as the pivotal evaluation of everything heard during the trial. Thus, sentencing stage cannot be underestimated, because otherwise all cases would be still open or half-done.

Order now

Related essays