The case of Morse v. Frederick took place in 2002. Deborah Morse imposed a penalty upon Joseph Frederick and she suspended him.  He was eighteen years old and he displayed the banner “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS”. This case was near the school. The court suspended him because he held up a sign that the principal interpreted as a pro-drug message. It was the period of Olympic Torch Relay in 2002. In his turn, Frederick sued, saying that his rights to free speech and thoughts were violated. However, his suit was declined (Sutton 2006).

This case was considered by the Chief Justice Roberts. He claimed that the First Amendment was not violated. He explained that the first part of the banner, bong hits, meant to smoke marijuana or to use illegal drugs. However, Frederick said that the word “hits” was used in another way, like “HiTS.” That is why it had another meaning. This case was very great and the Supreme Court pled the case (Sutton 2006).

The First Amendment protects the right of students to free speech and thoughts for forty years. Nevertheless, the court said that because of the closeness of the school the mission of discouraging drug use was filed. The main problem was that school censored student’s speech because they disliked it (Morse v. Frederick, 2007).

Deborah More won this case by a vote of 5 to 4. The most telling argument was that the incident has happened at a school-sponsored event and during the school day. That is why the Supreme Court applied the ‘school speech’ doctrine (Morse v. Frederick, 2007).

In my opinion, the Supreme Court was right. If I were the judge of the Supreme Court, I would be in the majority. I think that the propagation of drug use is the crime against the young population. Their consciousness is not fully formed and they will not perceive the word “hits” like abbreviation “HiTS”, but like the word “hits.” That is why I am totally on the side of the majority.               

Order now

Related essays