There were various responses to the different questions posed to the respondents. It is believed that varying responses were because individuals within the society hold different opinions relating to absolute power. Twenty-six respondents answered “Yes” while four answered “No” to the question about absolute power corruption. The statement “Absolute power leads to communication breakdowns” had 27 “Yes” responses and 3 “No” responses. “Absolute power leads to loss of public property leads to loss of property” had 26 “Yes” responses and 4 “No” responses. Whooping 30 “Yes” responses were received for the statemant “A leader who exercises absolute leadership tends to make irrational decisions”. Twenty respondents answered “Yes” while ten respondents answered “No” pertaining to the statement “A bsolute power is required to achieve some goals at some instances”. Twenty-two “Yes” responses were received for the statement “Absolute power could lead to notable development in instances of uncooperative citizens” while eight “No” responses were received. Minimum five respondents answered “Yes” while twenty-five answered “No” to the question “If absolute power corrupts, then every individual is corrupted”. Lastly, there were twelve “Yes” responses and eighteen “No” responses for the statement “Power tends to corrupt when it comes to the character of the individual”.
There were fascinating trends drawn from the responses. Youths in college aged between 18-35 years gave varying opinions relating to absolute power. It is believed that youths in this age bracket would hold different opinions because they are still learning newer things in the society. They have had different experiences that makes them give varying answers towards the different questions asked. In addition, youths in this age bracket could be easily influenced by the different situations relating to leadership in the society. Thus, they would hold different positions relating to the question of whether absolute power is desirable or not. Individuals aged above 50 years were totally opposed to absolute leadership. They asserted that absolute leadership would make the society retarded because all decisions are based on one individual. These people believe that they have had adequate experiences with absolute leadership. They point out that absolute leadership has been the main cause of disagreement in any given organization or state. Thus, there were mixed reactions from college students aged 18-25, while there was a firm opposition to absolute leadership among individuals aged above 50 years.
The trends were fascinating because of the difference in opinions and the reasons for the given opinions. Each group wants to believe that its opinions are the best and must be respected. There were fascinating arguments giving rise to the trends. From the trends, I would derive implications that assert that there exists an enormous difference between the reasonability of younger individuals and older individuals. Older individuals, in the society, tend to take a firm stand in some issues while youths would abound mixed reactions. The application of the trend is that as individuals grow older, they reason according to their initial experiences in life. Thus, they would mostly take a common stand.
The aforementioned responses are closely related to my own experience. Absolute power is a way to an individual’s change of behavior in the society. One would be possessed by the powers and would always want to be respected at all instances. This leads to dominance over other individuals. Most youths would hold mixed reactions towards absolute power, because some of them get favors from their friends who hold these positions. Older individuals understand from their experiences that absolute power is destructive to any organization. Thus, my experience is closely related to the responses given because they reflect a true description of what absolute power may result in.
The most interesting opinion brought forward by respondents was that we should work together as a whole in order to make the best choices. This implies that a united community would never fall. This opinion asserts that in case the community is more divided, it would be adversely affected by adverse leadership and people would not be in a position to make independent decisions. Working as an individual in such a community amounts to unwanted decisions that are made in the interest of the incumbent. Therefore, most respondents were of the opinion that we should work together as a whole in order to make best choices. This is especially due to reduced pressure on members.