With the increase of alcoholism and other acts of irresponsibility among parents, child endangerment has become a crucial issue in the U.S. There have been extreme cases of child abuse reported to authorities. For this reason, there was a need to take action in Anytown. This was the duty and function of the department of the Job and Family Services. They mainly used the social learning theory to come up with the suitable conclusion. This conclusion had its advantages, as well as disadvantages. That makes the content of this essay.
Potential ethical/moral issues
In the decision to separate children from child abusing families, there are two major issues that crop up. The first is the issue of separating a child from its parent. The other issue is that of taking the safety of the child into account. Every parent has the moral right to discipline his/her child. There is a significant effect in the separation of a child from his/her parents. The effect is mainly on the child. The state can offer safety to the child, but it cannot replace the parents. Every child needs his/her parents around, as he/she grows up. From this perspective, it is not morally right to separate a child from his/her parent. However, this is only one side of a coin. The fact that a child should not be separated from his/her parents has its limits. There are cases which are so extreme that they capture the attention of the public. These include issues of child abuse, in which the sufferer is the child. In such cases, the parent should be liable and answer before the law. However, this department did not take this fact into consideration. One or two irresponsible acts by a parent require counseling and close monitoring of a parent. However, this does not require separation of the child. This would result in unnecessary worries and psychological torture on the child (Waln, 2011).
Personal view on the ethical value of the policy
This policy is ideal for the world today. The cases of irresponsibility have always been seen among children in the past. However, they have now been the main characteristic of the parents. Therefore, this policy is rich, in terms of ethical value. This is because it ensures that irresponsible parents either choose to be responsible, or face justice. It would only be harsh to the parents who engage in acts of violence, with reference to their children. However, there is a negative implication when it comes to the effects on the child. There is need to reduce the six months period. This would ensure that the child is not away from the parent for a very long time period. In this case, the child will not face psychological torture from deprival of parental love.
Impact of the policy on its stakeholders
There are three parties on which the impact of this policy will be directed. These are: the child, the parent and the whole community. Therefore, it is a policy that has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the perspective of the analyst. To start with, this will have a positive impact on the whole community. The first few cases of implementing the policy will act as an example to parents who think that they can engage in acts of domestic violence and get away with it. This will help to reduce the reported cases of child abuse. Basically, this is the work of the law. It punishes the wrong doers and also, it prevents the occurrence and recurrence of the crime in the whole community. The impact of this policy on the parents will undoubtedly be negative. This might create fears among the parents when they intend to discipline their children. It is obvious that every child requires and needs to be disciplined for healthy growth and development. However, if the parents live in utter fear of being deprived of their children, they might shy away from disciplining their children. This would lead to a whole new problem in the community. The children will become a nuisance and cases if indiscipline among them would be on the rise. Therefore, this is a policy that requires revisiting, in terms of the offences, as well as the penalties (Johann, 2000).
Interpretation of the social learning theory
The social learning policy stated that children whose parents engage in acts of violence are more likely to engage in the same acts as they deal with others. Therefore, staying with such parents means bringing up an exact replica of the parent. Therefore, it is correct to conclude that the department of job and family services interpreted the policy accurately. This is because separating the child from such a parent would make sure that they are not in the presence of violent people. After the parent has undergone counseling and appropriate correctional measures, the child can be taken back to a rehabilitated parent. This would go a long way in ensuring that the children are raised to be responsible individuals who do not believe in violence when solving matters.
From the essay above, it is clear that the implementation of this policy would have its advantages and disadvantages. However, it is vivid that the advantages outshine the disadvantages. Therefore, this is a policy that is worth implementing. After all, the parents who will find it to be unfair have a clear motive to continue with their unjust acts on the children. Therefore, this policy should function to pick such parents out and bring them to justice. This would ensure that such acts are reduced by a great magnitude.