Racial discrimination has been observed to be one among the many issues that several schools have to deal with at present. It could not be denied that somehow, the emergence of multidisciplinary class handling creates a more definitive approach in handling the modern situations that schools have to face at present. As seen from the many definite reasons behind the growth of the number of immigrants from the minority groups that come to the urbanized areas to be able to live the life that they know they deserve, the level of discrimination within societies around the globe, especially that of the United States increase every year.
This is especially seen and evidently observed among public institutions including that of schools. As noted, public schools should be open to everyone wanting to learn. Deriving from the title of the institution itself as being “public”, the services of the institution need to be solely dependent on how they could be able to provide the educational needs of the greater number of the masses. Which means, regardless of any race, institutions such as public schools care more about the development of the children no matter what particular race they come from. However, an ideal process of applying the laws of human rights as it is, this thinking has not clearly affected the fact that there are numerous learning institutions around the United States that are undergoing the investigation procedures from the higher educational command with regards the lack of implication of the said process of being equal to all students who are in need of the education services that they are providing to the public.
In this discussion, the area of focus would be that of the county of South Carolina. Through the examples of the case on Brown vs. the Board of Education in Topeka and that of the Plessy vs. Fergusson case, the understanding on how changes in educational institution administration systems shall be better identified as to how much they affect the lives of the students and the teachers alike as they begin to accept matters as part of the human regular life.
About the Case of Brown versus the Board of Education in TOPEKA
Education is for all. The need to learn is certainly a need of each person and is also a part of his or her rights that needs to be well recognized. Undeniably, the need to be educated for a better life in the future should not be kept away from anyone as each person needs this particular development phase for personal and mental growth that would lead them to better prosper in life. It is indeed a large implication that education is now believed as part of the basic needs of humans along with that of food and shelter.
However, with minorities growing into the urban areas around the United States, an aggressive approach to handling differences especially in schools made it possible for black students to miss school because of not being accepted. Since then, the growth of division among schools especially when it comes to social and racial stratification has continuously gone up to a shocking rate of 14% every year. Up until these days, even though discrimination is hardly suppressed by the current social analysts through studies and implicative practices as well as that of the public discussions handled to help the young generation along with that of the older ones to realize their position in the society, it still creates a deep impact on the kind of life that minorities are living with at present.
In the case of Brown versus the Board of Education in TOPEKA, it could be observed how the declaration of state laws that established a discouraging system of education that involves the separation of the public schools for the white and black children all around the state made it possible for the minorities of the society to be given less chance to receive high quality education. Because of the separation, only the white students had the chance of becoming more acquainted with the right kind of education that they need. Undeniably, it could be managed that somehow, the life of these young black children had lesser chance of surviving in the future due to lack of proper education. In the long run, this state law would result to the remorse of the black population over getting the right kind of job that they need to be able to lead a better life. Again, they would be subjected to the lording of their white counterparts.
As the results of the said state law became more obvious, the realization of the state over the need to change the statements and provisions of this rule has finally come into the attention of the administrators. Definitely, it could not be denied that somehow, the state law needed to be altered so as to simply assure that this same law would not create problems later on in the future. As an answer to the situation, the Pelssy versus Ferguson has been introduced. This state law shall be discussed in the section that follows.
About Plessy and Ferguson (1986)
The Brown vs the Board of Education in Topeka practically resulted to dreadful indications of discrimination not only among the provisions given to the students but also to that of the major attention given to the basic needs of the students studying in major “black schools”. The need to undo this effect is essential not only for protecting the rights of the children but for protecting the future itself. It could be noticed how these matters have been clearly managed to create a well manifesting condition for those that are involved in the issue. This consideration of change is directed towards insisting on the need of providing for the educational needs of the children in the community in an equal manner to give them a fair share of whatever it is that they deserve to have in the future.
For this reason, Plessy vs Ferguson has been released. It further states that de jure racial segregation was an identified violation of the equal protection clause that is stated in the 14th amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. This means that the establishment of the Plessy vs Ferguson creates a more definite approach towards stopping the effects of the Brown vs the Board of Education in Topeka insists on the existence of racial discrimination on the process by which education is given for the young generation to enjoy.
Through this alteration of the state law, a hope for a more well defines society. Although the rule did not completely removed discrimination in the face of the county, the level of its concentration on tormenting the minors even as they are still beginning in school practically gives a good ground for better human relations in the future. There is expected to be less manifestation of discrimination later on as the young children are taught to consider their peers as they are going to school in a regular basis.
Most likely, it is through this change that the management of modern educational system has also been changed into helping the children understand their supposed standing when it comes to discrimination and how they should practically deal with it. Definitely, with the considerable matter to observe as to how the students face their situations in school, educators of these learning institutions are given the responsibility to look over the needs of their students. This includes their educational provisions, health assistance program allowances, and other matters that would affect a child’s growth in a community that they ought to live in with a positive outlook in life. Indeed, in a society of inequality, living a life that is straight forward without noticing the dreadful effects of discrimination is not that easy. However, with the effective social management applied in the situation, handling such issues may not be so much of an issue anymore. Through gradually positioning the minds of the children towards seeing matters in an equal way with that of their peers, they are given the right chance that they need to make a definite approach in handling several disturbances in connection with the relationship that they establish with their peers. Undeniably, the shaping of the children’s attitude towards discrimination while they are still young could assist them in seeing equality as a major source of development and understanding in their later lives.
Racism and the Current Education System in South Carolina
South Carolina, being the core destination that is referred to in this discussion as the different laws of educational provisions released during the early 1900’s in the county depicts a rather exemplary community that aims to maintain balance and equality amongst its people. It could not be denied that the problem of inequality among schools has been a definite turnaround for more counties around the United States but South Carolina was among the few that tried to immediately resolve the issues for the sake of fixing the social situations occurring in the county.
At present, as educational provisions are aimed to target both the white and the black society along with that of the other minorities that are already residing in the country, an understanding of the major effects that equality has on the belief of the children towards discrimination has created a major breakthrough in reducing the number of children from the minority groups that are being bullied at school. Of course, reality suggests that the number would never be erased as there are still some young individuals who are mandated by their parents and the people of within their communities to think otherwise of their counterparts in the society. Definitely though, the effects of the institutional learning systems to these young children is considered to be more definite and insistently effective for the schooling generation.
Past the years of 1986 when Plessy vs Fergusson was first introduced to South Carolina, the campaign for having an equal community that reduced the effects of discrimination has somehow been experienced. However, with the turn of time, this campaign has been practically neglected especially that the problem now is the fact that there are only a few who are able to obtain proper education due to economic and financial constraints, and again, most of these young ones include that of the children of the minority groups residing in South Carolina.