Social class defines someone’s identity. Therefore, it is true to state that Social class is a powerful predictor of human values and behavior. People tend to organize themselves in a given social class. This is determined by financial ability, similar interests, shared values, and education level among others. In addition, this leads to development of a given social class that has distinct characteristic in comparison with others. Thus, members of the same social class are likely to develop unique values and behaviors. Moreover, interactions are confined within a given social class. They are likely to develop their own culture that will define them. Although personal behavior may develop based on various factors, social class is said to have a greater influence. It is obvious that patterns of behavior and adopted values reveal what type of social class that one belongs.
Margaret Mead developed the systems theory. It involves study of systems that include; local and global systems, human interactions, physiological systems and climate as they relate to human development. Social theory identity was developed by Saul Mcleood. This studies the identity of an individual in the society as well as group membership. In essence, the theory views society as a sense of self esteem and pride. Sense of belonging is also developed by the virtue that one belongs to a given social group. Ruth Benedict also developed a theory about cultural relativity. The theory establishes that culture enables one to develop character. Moreover, she argues that no culture is superior to the other. Thus, social classes should not be used to intimidate others.
Beatrice Whiting developed the Social Scientific theory. The theory focuses on cultural and human development. Thus, she addresses issues related to children, families and communities. According to Whiting, personal identity is developed through social interaction, cognition and ecology. She integrates several aspects of human development that defines an individual.
The above theories possess some of similarities that include the following: first, all the theories addresses issues of human development, identity and personality. Although the scholars have taken a different angle, they all merge on how culture and society defines an individual. Nevertheless, the theories differ in that some scholars such as Whiting use scientific approach to define personality. In addition, there is a vivid difference in the way identity is established within a given social set up.