The customs and society’s expectations are not always met by the medical technology usage and developments. The society is often disappointed with the medical technology ineffectiveness and costs. The public has consequently come out strongly to express their temper claiming that medical technologies usage and developments do not behave to the expectations of the society, the existing medical technologies ideology operation are not independent of the resources available and the medical technology expectations are guided by omniscient and objective medical establishment that need to be seriously redefined. The above situation has led to the society loosing its trust on medical technology development and usage as they both don’t meet the every society expectations. Medially technology was believed to satisfy consumers but it has since then bear the brunt liability when it fails (Tovey & Easthope 56)
Considering the medical technology with the norm driven conduct in the society, its efficiency and effectiveness can be regarded as being a relative concept. Some interventions have proved to be more efficient than others thus more satisfactory. Other medical technologies have since proved to meet the patient’s medical needs while making the best of the resources available. However, other normal factors step in such as the cost of such medial care which makes it impossible for some patients to enjoy such services. Such patients will not be satisfied with the same effective and efficient medical technology. This brings in the factor of public budget relations in medical technology. Some patient’s preferences and location make it inconvenient for them to access such technology thus do not medically utilize them. This calls for the need of an equitable distribution of medical technology services among people with different income levels. The ideal of fairness and equity when it comes to medical technology has to have political, economic, social, and ethical foundations (Tovey & Easthope 108).
The effectiveness issue has since proved to have unifying force with regards to professional ethics. It has been evidently substantiated that the effectiveness of many emerging and current medical technologies has frequently been questioned and in many instances considered to be lacking. Researches carried out on medical interventions are often methodologically flawed and poorly designed. Most medical technologies today fail to critically evaluate medical situations, and approach such clinical problems with a wide range of variance yet they are meant to have the same output (Tovey & Easthope 67).
The technologies have also proved to be too costly, too inflexible, and too unwisely. Hospitals have been set up around acute care, however, the threat of viral diseases and other illness has contributed to more than 90% of the deaths recorded in most of the nations. The medical technologies were meant to be solutions to such situations yet there seems to be no much difference compared to the past. The management of such medical technologies has been another set back. It has been characterized by mistakes and negligence. Such situations are as vital as resulting to death or consequential mix up of results and samples. Customary morality in relation to medical medication has also received many criticisms.
Most developments and usage of these technologies are meant for treatment but do not offer other specialized care that patients need after or before treatment. The technologies do not provide the care that was once offered by the nurses. Some of technologies have also provided to be harmful to the patients like the X-ray exposure. They lead to side effects or at times harm the patient on the process of treating them (Tovey & Easthope167). Medical technology usage and development has had a negative interface in relation to the society’s customs and expectations. This has been due to its ineffectiveness in its professional ethics, handling of customary morality and dealing with the human conducts that are norm driven.