The association between Mc Candles and the wild is an insight into the naivety of a young man, whom against all odds abandons the pleasantries of the world to venture into the life of abject poverty. Inclined to the synopsis of “Into the wild: philosophical journey or suicidal foully,” krakauer presents a fictitious illusion that explains why against all odds, the fate of life depends on the choices people make. Indeed the reader cannot help to work against the constraints of irony of a man with a college education abandoning all the responsibilities within his jurisdiction including his vehicle, family and life after venturing into the Alaskan wilderness. To a casual observer, the decision of Mc candles to wander to the wilderness would be viewed as a move to find real freedom in the world while the practical insinuation of this story is emblematically a suicidal foully, which generates the essence of a close reflection into the intentions of Mc Candless in making such a decision and the consequences therein that also forms part of the essence of this essay ( Krakauer 4).
Into the wild
Mc Candless made the decision to wander off to the Alaskan wilderness to look for real freedom in life, where in the long run, he unravels the real freedom through alienating himself from the influence of the world, where technology does not matter to him. His modes of communication change with no access to the parental decisions, which he considered a disguise in his life. He confines to Carine, the sister about his intentions to walk out of an influence of a world with decisions solely dependent on the influence of other people especially his parents, whom he views as being immoral. For instance, he admits that “the worried parents are fucking nuts” and goes ahead to refer to them as “imbeciles” ( Krakauer 5).
The decision of finding for freedom is accomplished through his death, where the final journey was a form of suicidal foully to the contender in the sense that abandoning the responsibilities of time and space has an impact on the final fate of life. an insight into the living conditions, which were presumed to be the freedom in life for Mc Candless arouses the fate of alienation from reality, where having been rooted to a family with capabilities like, “they enjoy all the goodies associated with that status”, a venture into the wilderness would not have brought about freedom unless his intention was to cease his existence through suicide and consequent death ( Krakauer 6).
The other reason why Mc candles wanders to the estranged land is because his convictions are born out of contention with the values he holds as being true and nobody could imposition their values on him. For instance, “lived by the philosophies he espouses” ( Krakauer 6). This is to mean that having a conviction that his life only mattered to him, Mc candles could not take heed to any interventions. Moreover, the values he held were born out of self conviction, where no amount of dissuasion could have helped to reverse his decision of leaving a lavish kind of life to ponder on life without access to essential needs.
Having a had a prior accomplice with the likes of Franz, who persuaded Mc Candles not to leave the home for a far away land, contention to such an approach would seem barren. This also shows that the conviction of Mc Candless is based on self proclamation, where no one else matters. The values he holds in life are accomplished when indeed he renounces all the gifts accorded to him after his graduation ceremony including a car and does not utilize the opportunity to find a good paying job but instead wanders to fend off in the wild ( Krakauer 12).
The consequences of contravention from reality is also an elucidation from the action of Mc Candles to wander to the Alaskan wild with the probability of the influence of the spiritual convictions, where the characters like Franz could best elaborate the lack of interconnectedness between self decisions and a belief in the supreme deity ( Sorenson 78). For Franz, having lost a companion to the wilderness meant that it was a prayer turned wayward to the level that he starts using alcohol as a form of solace to the tribulations emanating from alienation with the spiritual thinking.
The lack of interconnectedness between the spiritual intervention and the self conviction is the result of the consequences that befell Mc candles, where he met his untimely death rooted to the grounds of lack of the belief in the power of the supreme deity and the consequent intervention. Indeed, Krakauer tries to show the consequences of sin through manifestation of the reality with the interventions from the supreme deity, where lack of this interconnectedness results in dire consequences like death (Waaijman 34).
As the consequences of disobedience for nature unfold, it is evident that the intention of Mc Candles to prefer the wild to his maternal home was indeed suicidal, where in the long run, he attempts to rejoin a settled kind of lifestyle without vain. This implies that the perceived nature and the environments of jurisdiction within the mandate of Mc Candles in the wilderness were predetermined. Having had a predetermined judgment to the conditions of life in the wilderness, the contender knew that susceptibility to this could lead to bad ends including the formidable death, where he is inclined to the consequences of lack of shelter, clean food and proper medication services ( Rice 109).
Even though a casual observer might prejudge this as a form of shunning the responsibilities in the immediate world around him, the responsibilities accorded to him in the wilderness were unbearable. With a preamble to the consequences of subjection to this kind of life, Mc Candles should have had a prior intention of succumbing to the constraints of life and die off happily in the wilderness on a willful suicidal affair. This is accomplished from the fact that even after a face to face contact with the consequences of such a kind of life in the wilderness, he makes no point of return, where he was sure of his fate in the wilderness, which he practically meets ( Krakauer 23).
Overly, the kind of life that meets the demands of Mc Candles is a form of elaboration of the consequences of deviations from the reality, where death is often the result. This is elucidated in the synopsis of the story where a young man fends off the wild at the expense of the lavish life subjected to the maternal family of middle class level. The ironical part of the synopsis lies in the conviction that the contender was educated putting no excuses to the reasoning as having been born out of illiteracy. Moreover, an insight into the tribulations of an educated person after completion of study with material presents from the function including a car as a present would have culminated into a better outcome than that of finding a living in the wild. For instance, “they enjoy all the goodies associated with that status.” This is a form of alienation from reality, whose consequence is often death. Consequently, having had to show the hypocrisy in his faith, Mc Candless through consideration of an association with the norms of society, which he considered meddling with his life, death was the resolute freedom.
The new words that compliment with the synthesis from these scenes rage from affluence, which means wealth, for instance the level of affluence in a community determines the well being of a the people. On the other hand, the word goodies mean the material things in the world. For instance, Mc Candless could not get in touch with the goodies from his family after the rejection of communication with his family. Consequently, spiritual means the divine power. For instance, lack of believe in spiritual power made Franz to associate his life to alcohol.